English spelling is broken. Let's fix it!

International English Spelling Congress: time for action

The Society is arranging an international congress to choose a new English spelling scheme. You are invited to take part and share in this world-changing event. Start by visiting the IESC home page.

English spelling is broken ...

English spelling is broken. Examples like comb, bomb and tomb, or height and weight, abound. And no-one seems to know whether the down pipe from a gutter is a rone, a rhone, a roan or something else.

English spelling has been chopped and changed by countless scribes, printers, invaders and others since the Roman alphabet was first used to write Old English during the seventh century, and it does not match the way we speak today.  The English Spelling Society exists to repair our broken spelling.

In this website you can discover the past, present and future of English Spelling:

• Discover the amazing history of English spelling — how it came to be the way it is, and what happened to previous attempts to put it right.
• Find out just how crazy English spelling is today — and how much that costs in economic and social terms.
• See what The English Spelling Society is planning to do — and how you can help.

English spelling is broken. Together, we can do something about that.

Latest news

There is an exceptional level of news this week, but much of it is about spelling bees, so these have been placed into their very own Beehive below.

2018-04-25 — Etymology gleanings for April 2018 A Turning Point in the History of Spelling Reform? More ►

2018-04-23 — Emoji Are Ruining Grasp of English, Says Dumbest Language Story of the Week More ►

2018-04-23 — 94% Of Brits Think Correct Use Of The Queen's English Is Slipping research shows that over half (54%) of Brits are not confident with their spelling and grammar skills. More ►

2018-04-19 — Teachers in UK report growing 'vocabulary deficiency' Problem exists throughout primary and secondary school, leading to lower self-esteem and negative behaviourMore ►

2018-04-18 — Crying face: Emoji 'are ruining the English language because young people use them to communicate and don't bother with words' Emoji may be a fun form of communication but they are destroying the English language, a study by Google has revealed. More ►

2018-04-18 — Emoji leading to 'serious decline' in English skills Nearly half of British adults are not confident with their grammar and spelling, YouTube research found. More ►

2018-04-16 — English, we hardly knew ye When the English language finally gives up the ghost, who will mourn it? More ►

2018-04-12 — Jail pushes out gaol as language modernises ENGLISH is a brilliant language. More ►

2018-04-12 — Media bias hinders language learning More ►

 

Beehive

Spelling bees are always popular news stories. While the Society does not belittle the hard work that students put in for these events, or deny that they teach useful skills, the fact remains that the mere existence of spelling bees is perhaps the best illustration of the irregularity of English spelling.

Imagine if we had numbering bees, where contestants, instead of spelling out the letters in a word, had to spell out the numerals in a number. "Contestant, spell eighty-five thousand, nine hundred and forty-three." The contestant pauses, and then speaks: "8-5-9-4-3."

The Society looks forward to a day when spelling bees would be just as ludicrous as numbering bees.

2018-04-23 — The 25 Toughest Winning Words from the National Spelling Bee The Scripps National Spelling Bee has been a yearly tradition since the 1920s. How would you fare trying to spell these baffling winning words? More ►

2018-04-12 — Gud Luk, Keeds! Fore Humbolt Stoodents Heded Too Staet Spelin Be More ►

Page editor: N Paterson. Contact by email or form.
Did You Know:

• Ask your friend what Y-E-S spells. They won't have any difficulty saying yes. Then ask what E-Y-E-S spells. It's easy when it's written down, but surprisingly difficult when it's spoken. See a YouTube video of this.

• Who has not heard i before e, except after c. A University of Warwick statistician put it to the test. He plugged a list of 350,000 English words into a statistical program to see if the math checked out. It didn't.

• When Adam met Eve for the first time, he said Madam, I'm Adam. This is a palindrome — a phrase or sentence in which the letters, words or even lines read the same in either direction. Adam hoped to impress the most beautiful woman in the world, but she more than matched him by replying simply, Eve. Not bad given that writing, and therefore palindromes, and English ones in particular, had not yet been invented! More palindromes, and a wonderful palindromic poem.

• How would you pronounce ghoti? Pronounce it like this:

and you get ... fish! Thanks to Charles Ollier for writing this in 1855 — and for showing that English spelling has been ludicrous for quite some time.

• One of the arguments in favour of keeping English spelling unchanged is to show the etymology of words. For example, the silent s in island shows the link to the Latin insula. But island actually derives from the Old English íglund, not from the Latin at all. More examples at Mental Floss.

 

Page editor: N Paterson. Contact by email or form.
FAMOUS ONES WHO WANTED TO IMPROVE
THE ENGLISH SPELLING SYSTEM

​Spelling reform is not a new idea!

Benjamin Franklin "The same is to be observed in all the letters, vowels, and consonants, that wherever they are met with, or in whatever company, their sound is always the same. It is also intended that there be no superfluous letters used in spelling, i.e. no letter that is not sounded [...]"  Franklin proposed a spelling scheme with 6 new letters. (Franklin 1806 p359)

Theodore Roosevelt "It is merely an attempt [...] to make our spelling a little less foolish and fantastic." Theodore Roosevelt promoted the Simplified Spelling Board's gradual reform (see Twain below). (Roosevelt 1906, p3)

Mark Twain "It is my belief that an effort at a slow and gradual change is not worth while. [...] It is the sudden changes [...] that have the best chance of winning in our day. Can we expect a sudden change in our spelling? I think not. But I wish I could see it tried. [...] By a sudden and comprehensive rush the present spelling could be entirely changed and the substitute spelling be accepted, all in the space of a couple of years; and preferred in another couple. But it won't happen, and I am as sorry as a dog." (Twain 1997, pp208-212)

Page editor: N Paterson. Contact by email or form.